Liberals enraged at DeSantis again. FL allowing people to kick out squatters in a day

[j3lademaster]

You have basically 2 types of socialists in the US. The kind that come from some type of privilege, usually from stable parents or a good paying job. Those types say they are socialists because they want the attention and appearance of being seen as altruistic knowing full well they will never have to experience the dark side of socialism here. Then you have people that want to be seen as opinion leaders of the poor and uneducated,either to gain power in the community and/or for personal profit(e.g. BLM). I'm certain you are of the former

Not true, and you have to split the high earners by level of education. A store manager at Costco will probably have different opinions than an Engineer at Intel with a PHD despite earning about the same. There’s a huge problem when people who should be working on rockets are working at Meta instead. They’re forwarding capitalism instead of society like they should, and since taxes should be in the interest of society, taxes should subsidize these kinds of high skill jobs to be competitive. M4all will be another good thing because it helps small business, the impoverished and job mobility for your higher earners(since your job isn’t tied to benefits). A friend of mine signed a noncompete for a firm that was absolved. He’s still getting paid and cannot get a new job because the noncompete is still valid, but he has to cover insurance out of pocket. It’d be like $1700/mo if his wife didn’t have a job with insurance, don’t tell me that isn’t ****ed. So yeah, there are plenty of reasons high educated high earners want social safety nets outside of ‘virtue signaling’.

[Media Moderator]

What you are illustrating is the complexity of being a rent seeker when the government isn’t holding your hand allowing for it to go smoothly.

Most property owners have the means to remove a squatter and there would be no shortage of people willing to rough up squatters for a nice check if the government didn't want to get involved. Let's be hopeful it never comes to that.

There are over 4 million Section 8 vouchers and rent assistance beneficiaries in the US. The government holds rent seeker's hands plenty without having to squat

[Norcaliblunt]

Most property owners have the means to remove a squatter and there would be no shortage of people willing to rough up squatters for a nice check if the government didn't want to get involved. Let's be hopeful it never comes to that.

There are over 4 million Section 8 vouchers and rent assistance beneficiaries in the US. The government holds rent seeker's hands plenty without having to squat

Hey if “property owners” wanna remove or prevent squatters themselves I’m for it. But if you are using the gov for protection you best believe your tenant / squater is using the gov for protection too.

[SATAN]

Why is diamenz so dumb?

[Patrick Chewing]

Why is diamenz so dumb?

Why are you so gay?

[SATAN]

[Patrick Chewing]

Satan is gay

[SATAN]

I don't consider words like that insulting, sorry f*ggot.

[Baller234]

Hey if “property owners” wanna remove or prevent squatters themselves I’m for it. But if you are using the gov for protection you best believe your tenant / squater is using the gov for protection too.

^ Lmao, this dude is slowly approaching Lakers Legend as the absolute worst poster on the forum. Although unlike LL who's basically just trolling, this guy actually thinks he's making a valid argument.

Squatters are thieves. They have human rights but they don't have property rights. Therefore the government should not be under any obligation to protect their non-existent rights to a given property.

[RRR3]

^ Lmao, this dude is slowly approaching Lakers Legend as the absolute worst poster on the forum. Although unlike LL who's basically just trolling, this guy actually thinks he's making a valid argument.

Squatters are thieves. They have human rights but they don't have property rights. Therefore the government should not be under any obligation to protect their non-existent rights to a given property.

Property rights need a state to enforce them which was his point.

[Baller234]

Property rights need a state to enforce them which was his point.

So you and the other genius think that a squatter (thief) should be protected under the same rights as the person who actually owns the property?



I really can't with this kid anymore.

[Patrick Chewing]

I don't consider words like that insulting, sorry f*ggot.

Of course you do, you raging homosexual. Eat a bag of *****.

[Patrick Chewing]

So you and the other genius think that a squatter (thief) should be protected under the same rights as the person who actually owns the property?



I really can't with this kid anymore.

He’s a ****ing troll. **** him. He’s not a serious person, that’s why he’s easy to make fun of. Dude works part-time at a library and still lives with his parents. That’s the kind of loser we’re dealing with.

[RRR3]

So you and the other genius think that a squatter (thief) should be protected under the same rights as the person who actually owns the property?



I really can't with this kid anymore.

I don’t think a state should exist at all. I was just explaining what he was saying since you couldn’t comprehend it.

[SATAN]

Chewing is absolutely boiling