View Poll Results: Who is the better Offensive Player?

Voters
21. You may not vote on this poll
  • MJ

    14 66.67%
  • Jokic

    7 33.33%
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 20 of 20
  1. #16
    Eye of the tiger beasted's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2021
    Location
    MIA
    Posts
    1,155

    Default Re: Better Offensive Peak: Jokic or MJ?

    I'm not sure about this one. Which player averaged 36 PPG on 61% TS in a Finals. I'll take that guy.

  2. #17
    NBA Legend and Hall of Famer Manny98's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    In Your Head
    Posts
    20,992

    Default Re: Better Offensive Peak: Jokic or MJ?

    In terms of offensive peaks I have Jokic and Curry 1 & 2 with LeBron and MJ just behind

  3. #18
    NBA Legend FKAri's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    16,644

    Default Re: Better Offensive Peak: Jokic or MJ?

    Quote Originally Posted by beasted View Post
    I'm not sure about this one. Which player averaged 36 PPG on 61% TS in a Finals. I'll take that guy.
    I wouldn't mind taking the guy who averaged 30, 14, 7 on 67% either. Regardless, the stats don't tell the whole story.

  4. #19
    NBA rookie of the year AlternativeAcc.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Posts
    6,988

    Default Re: Better Offensive Peak: Jokic or MJ?

    Quote Originally Posted by beasted View Post
    I'm not sure about this one. Which player averaged 36 PPG on 61% TS in a Finals. I'll take that guy.
    Durant averaged 36 on 70% TS. What's your point?

  5. #20
    College superstar rmt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    4,585

    Default Re: Better Offensive Peak: Jokic or MJ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Carbine View Post
    I would say Jordan if we are accounting for the era in which they played in. Averaging 34 a game in the playoffs for the first three peat when scoring was harder to come by meant what he was the best at (scoring) was at a premium.

    It was at even more or a premium in the last three peat when the Bulls as a team averaged 94 ppg in the playoffs and he was giving 31 a game.

    .
    I agree. It's the load - not ppg - the difference in eras are too different to go by ppg. In today's era, it's common place to see 40, 50... points by even not top tier players - not to mention 70+ point halves.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •