Biden administration ADMITS flying 320,000 migrants secretly into the U.S.

[Baller234]

Democrats:

"WE'RE the ones who are trying to combat illegal immigration!"


Also Democrats:

"There's no such thing as an illegal immigrant!"

[diamenz]

Democrats:

"WE'RE the ones who are trying to combat illegal immigration!"


Also Democrats:

"There's no such thing as an illegal immigrant!"

i can't believe he's retracting the most respectable part of his speech. take a look at a few of the top youtube comments:

The perpetrator was an illegal immigrant. Start having compassion for the victim, Laken Riley, and not the assailant.

He’s more worried about offending a murderer than apologizing to Laken Riley’s family for getting her name wrong. Disgusting.

WOW! He doesn't apologize for getting Laken Riley's name wrong, he's apologizing to Laken Riley's murderer.

Grow a spine dude

yeah seriously joe, grow a spine. especially since your balls are already being kept in a safe in tel aviv.

[Baller234]

i can't believe he's retracting the most respectable part of his speech. take a look at a few of the top youtube comments:









yeah seriously joe, grow a spine. especially since your balls are already being kept in a safe in tel aviv.

Someone should show him this video of Chuck Schumer from 2009.




If Schumer gave this exact speech today, he would be cast out of the party.

I would love for the democrats to tell us what changed.

[Patrick Chewing]

Democrats:

"WE'RE the ones who are trying to combat illegal immigration!"


Also Democrats:

"There's no such thing as an illegal immigrant!"

There will be no country if Democrats stay in power.

[Jasper]

There will be no country if Democrats stay in power.

better than being in a dictatorship with nazi dumpster and you as his shank whacker

[Patrick Chewing]

better than being in a dictatorship with nazi dumpster and you as his shank whacker

We’re in a dictatorship now you inbred redneck. Grow a brain.

[Nanners]

Republicans can surely propose an immigration bill. Have they?

Most, if not all, bills are each side giving up something and getting something in return. The immigration/foreign aid bill for Ukraine+Israel gave the Republicans most of what they wanted on immigration (much more than democrats would have agreed to under most circumstances). However, Republicans had dug in on no aid for Ukraine. If it was just Israel by itself, they would have been falling over each other in a stampede to sign.

Even outside that, Republicans had gotten so much that they had enough Republican support to get it through. Until shepherd Donald happened, feeling threatened if Biden was the one signing it into law in election year. Trump had been talking immigration since 2015 but never actually did anything about it while in office.

From that bill btw, Ukraine aid for 2024 would be $60 billion out of $118 billion overall. Essentially have to ask is immigration issue worth $60 billion in Ukraine aid to Republicans? If not, what is their counter-proposal? (they didn't provide a counter proposal after shepherd Donald told them to kill it btw)

On cue from shepherd Donald, speaker blasted the bill for including Ukraine aid in there and blasted Democrats for doing nothing to address the border. After he got the bill, Johnson blasted Democrats for not proposing a bill on the border. He is arguing both ways. The intent is clear - nothing is getting done in Congress or Supreme Court until November when Grandpa Joe wins the election again.

We dont need any new bills to address the border situation... Donald Trump didnt have any special border bills when he was in office, but during his tenure illegal crossings were a tiny fraction of what they are now. In order to address the border situation, all Biden needs to do is start enforcing the existing border laws.

[ZenMaster]

Btw, I watched the two clips by hawley and cruz. It's laughable how they bombard questions and don't allow the guy to answer. Especially cruz, who is jumping from bs question to bs question. Typical republican tactics.

From looking into this app, the US is not paying for the transportation of those who apply btw. They must apply, they get vetted, and if approved, they are told to report to a port of entry. Having said that, it does appear to be exploited because it can take years for the asylum case to be heard with the sheer volume. About 400k people over 13 months have come in using the app. The goal was to lessen the people getting to the border by controlling how many got in with the app, but it has not worked as it was meant to be.

https://hias.org/news/asylum-seekers...or-challenges/

1,500 appointments per day are allowed out of millions of applicants. So 7,500 a week, 30k per month. And there is no guarantee all of them make it in. The goal was to cut down on the number of people at the border if they can't seek asylum without getting appointment on the app. It also allows a background check of the applications. Sure, someone may provide fraudulent information so I do think the asylum request should be stringent for potential asylum seekers.

Things hawley left out intentionally.

This is ChatGPT level post with a terrible prompt, what you describe is a green card function for illegal immigrants with a funnel included for inducing more illegal immigration since you had to be in Mexico to apply - what are people from Venezuela who wants into the US likely to do if they are in Mexico to apply for this green card and get denied or experience issues with the app, go back home or cross the border by foot?
The app worked as intended, just not as pretended..

As Nanners said, there's no bill needed as we know the fix to illegal immigration. Also, discussing bills which you like so much to do - running a proxy war and fighting illegal immigration have nothing to do with each other and it makes no sense to that any bill should cover both issues.

where u been bro???

Moved to a new country and started new work, lots to do

[BurningHammer]

We’re in a dictatorship now you inbred redneck. Grow a brain.

Dictatorship is when Democrats is in power?

[Baller234]

Dictatorship is when Democrats is in power?

- Forced vaccinations
- Imprisoning civilians and political dissidents
- Blocking other party members from challenging

[Patrick Chewing]

- Forced vaccinations
- Imprisoning civilians and political dissidents
- Blocking other party members from challenging

It's too easy with these guys. They're either completely clueless or just that dumb.